<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New PR &#038; the 2006 PR Week Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2006/01/13/newpr-2006-prweek-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2006/01/13/newpr-2006-prweek-awards/</link>
	<description>Constantin Basturea's weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: smoking quit</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2006/01/13/newpr-2006-prweek-awards/#comment-65357</link>
		<dc:creator>smoking quit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.basturea.com/?p=108#comment-65357</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;way to quit smoking&lt;/strong&gt;

quit smoking cigarette</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>way to quit smoking</strong></p>
<p>quit smoking cigarette</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Agony, Comeupance, and Learning Experience of Social Media Rage at infOpinions?</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2006/01/13/newpr-2006-prweek-awards/#comment-44561</link>
		<dc:creator>The Agony, Comeupance, and Learning Experience of Social Media Rage at infOpinions?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.basturea.com/?p=108#comment-44561</guid>
		<description>[...] Are they embarrassed by all this rumbling? I'm sure they are. Should they be? Of course. The errors (whatever you want to call them) were bad. They touched the core of transparency and open communication. I do not, however, think these incidences define the company or the people. As difficult and embarrassing as this experience may be, we should thank Edelman. They are, still, the most public, and largest group of, practitioners of social media by large PR firms. Oh, sure - others may be doing more work. They may even be doing it better. But, I don't see those firms taking the public stage like Edelman has over the past year. Ask yourself, what are these other large firms doing? You know, WS, HK, FH and other firms&#8230;. what are they doing?  I've learned a bit from things like the PR Week Awards program.  Still, I don't know much about their clients and social media work. I don't see them talking about it to the degree that Edelman is talking about it.  And, before you suggest it &#8230; I have been looking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are they embarrassed by all this rumbling? I&#8217;m sure they are. Should they be? Of course. The errors (whatever you want to call them) were bad. They touched the core of transparency and open communication. I do not, however, think these incidences define the company or the people. As difficult and embarrassing as this experience may be, we should thank Edelman. They are, still, the most public, and largest group of, practitioners of social media by large PR firms. Oh, sure - others may be doing more work. They may even be doing it better. But, I don&#8217;t see those firms taking the public stage like Edelman has over the past year. Ask yourself, what are these other large firms doing? You know, WS, HK, FH and other firms&#8230;. what are they doing?  I&#8217;ve learned a bit from things like the PR Week Awards program.  Still, I don&#8217;t know much about their clients and social media work. I don&#8217;t see them talking about it to the degree that Edelman is talking about it.  And, before you suggest it &#8230; I have been looking. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
