<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s missing from the Edelman/Technorati blogger study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2006/01/12/edelman-survey-methodology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2006/01/12/edelman-survey-methodology/</link>
	<description>Constantin Basturea's weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PR meets the WWW &#187; Japanese bloggers survey published by Edelman/Technorati</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2006/01/12/edelman-survey-methodology/#comment-14971</link>
		<dc:creator>PR meets the WWW &#187; Japanese bloggers survey published by Edelman/Technorati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.basturea.com/?p=107#comment-14971</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s good to see that the limitations of the survey are clearly stated this time (the previous study had serious problems in this area). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s good to see that the limitations of the survey are clearly stated this time (the previous study had serious problems in this area). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
