<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edelman/Technorati blogger survey &#8211; aide-memoire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/10/08/edelman-survey-aide-memoire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/10/08/edelman-survey-aide-memoire/</link>
	<description>Constantin Basturea&#039;s weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR meets the WWW &#187; Japanese bloggers survey published by Edelman/Technorati</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/10/08/edelman-survey-aide-memoire/comment-page-1/#comment-14970</link>
		<dc:creator>PR meets the WWW &#187; Japanese bloggers survey published by Edelman/Technorati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/?p=88#comment-14970</guid>
		<description>[...] Edelman and Technorati Japan have released the results of a blogger survey (PDF, 37 pages) (press release), based on the same questionnaire used for the survey published in January 2006. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edelman and Technorati Japan have released the results of a blogger survey (PDF, 37 pages) (press release), based on the same questionnaire used for the survey published in January 2006. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR meets the WWW &#187; Another pseudo-survey on corporate blogging hits the Web</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/10/08/edelman-survey-aide-memoire/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>PR meets the WWW &#187; Another pseudo-survey on corporate blogging hits the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/?p=88#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>[...] Side note: thereâ€™s no difference, essentially, between Guidewireâ€™s survey and the Edelman/Technorati recent survey. In fact, Guidewire was more upfront about the studyâ€™s limitations then Edelman (weâ€™re still waiting for Edelmanâ€™s official report about the methodology, two weeks after the results were released). But the effects of self-selection are more visible in Guidewireâ€™s survey. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Side note: thereâ€™s no difference, essentially, between Guidewireâ€™s survey and the Edelman/Technorati recent survey. In fact, Guidewire was more upfront about the studyâ€™s limitations then Edelman (weâ€™re still waiting for Edelmanâ€™s official report about the methodology, two weeks after the results were released). But the effects of self-selection are more visible in Guidewireâ€™s survey. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Mining</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/10/08/edelman-survey-aide-memoire/comment-page-1/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Mining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/?p=88#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Edelman/Technorati Survey &lt;/strong&gt;

Sometimes, in researching material for a post, one discovers that someone else has already written just what you wanted. So I&#039;m pointing to PR meets the WWW and their post on the controversial Edelman/Technorati survey. It presents a reasonable list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edelman/Technorati Survey </strong></p>
<p>Sometimes, in researching material for a post, one discovers that someone else has already written just what you wanted. So I&#8217;m pointing to PR meets the WWW and their post on the controversial Edelman/Technorati survey. It presents a reasonable list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

