<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lies, damn lies, and statistics: The Guardian on blog relations survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/09/27/blog-survey-guardian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/09/27/blog-survey-guardian/</link>
	<description>Constantin Basturea&#039;s weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR meets the WWW &#187; What are the standards for reporting blog surveys?</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/09/27/blog-survey-guardian/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>PR meets the WWW &#187; What are the standards for reporting blog surveys?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/?p=83#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>[...] More: Blog Relations &#8211;a &#8220;content consultancy based in London&#8221;&#8211; has published the results of its PR Survey on September 26. I wrote (on September 27) about the fact that The Guardian (free registration required), reporting on the survey, missed that: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More: Blog Relations &#8211;a &#8220;content consultancy based in London&#8221;&#8211; has published the results of its PR Survey on September 26. I wrote (on September 27) about the fact that The Guardian (free registration required), reporting on the survey, missed that: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john cass</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/09/27/blog-survey-guardian/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>john cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 21:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/?p=83#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s tough to get people to take surveys.  This is where marketing research or research and blogging intersect.  To build credible survey results a survey needs more respondents.  You need to build or hire a panel of people to take surveys.  That&#039;s one reason why I think that organizations like Pew Internet do such a good job.

I did have an idea for another survey, this time surveying each blogger&#039;s customers do find out the value of blogs to the customer.  Each blogger would run the survey on their own blog, and we&#039;d compile the results.  Yes, there are huge problems with gathering this sort of data.  But I think we would learn some things from the effort, and you never know it might start a movement to develop better results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s tough to get people to take surveys.  This is where marketing research or research and blogging intersect.  To build credible survey results a survey needs more respondents.  You need to build or hire a panel of people to take surveys.  That&#8217;s one reason why I think that organizations like Pew Internet do such a good job.</p>
<p>I did have an idea for another survey, this time surveying each blogger&#8217;s customers do find out the value of blogs to the customer.  Each blogger would run the survey on their own blog, and we&#8217;d compile the results.  Yes, there are huge problems with gathering this sort of data.  But I think we would learn some things from the effort, and you never know it might start a movement to develop better results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

