<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m asking for full-text RSS feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/full-text-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/full-text-rss/</link>
	<description>Constantin Basturea&#039;s weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: playboi130</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/full-text-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-557247</link>
		<dc:creator>playboi130</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/why-i-need-full-text-rss-feeds/#comment-557247</guid>
		<description>I have heard that this website is wonderful, but after visiting it I’ll disagree with most of the people, who think so. Yes, there is some fresh and interesting information but most of it looks unprsentable. There are so many ways to check information, haven’t you heard of it? After trying it several times I realized, that it’s not unique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard that this website is wonderful, but after visiting it I’ll disagree with most of the people, who think so. Yes, there is some fresh and interesting information but most of it looks unprsentable. There are so many ways to check information, haven’t you heard of it? After trying it several times I realized, that it’s not unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Awad's Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/full-text-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-19645</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Awad's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/why-i-need-full-text-rss-feeds/#comment-19645</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why I Switched to a Full-Text Feed&lt;/strong&gt;

After reading &#8220;Why I’m asking for full-text RSS feeds&#8221; by Constantin Basturea, and &#8220;Only Generous Bloggers Influence&#8221; by Steve Rubel, I have decided to publish my blog&#8217;s feed as a full text instead of just a summary.

As...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why I Switched to a Full-Text Feed</strong></p>
<p>After reading &#8220;Why I’m asking for full-text RSS feeds&#8221; by Constantin Basturea, and &#8220;Only Generous Bloggers Influence&#8221; by Steve Rubel, I have decided to publish my blog&#8217;s feed as a full text instead of just a summary.</p>
<p>As&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Jensen</title>
		<link>http://blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/full-text-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/blog.basturea.com/archives/2005/05/25/why-i-need-full-text-rss-feeds/#comment-942</guid>
		<description>I personally aggregate feeds to my discussion board, and my members freak out if they&#039;re partial feeds.  Maybe, just maybe, if they&#039;re two paragraphs and those two paragraphs summarize the article, they&#039;re fine.  Meaning, none of my people complain about slashdot, since the article really is only if you want to know more, and the paragraph is enough for most of us.  But it&#039;s not even worth my time to suggest something that&#039;s not full-text to them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally aggregate feeds to my discussion board, and my members freak out if they&#8217;re partial feeds.  Maybe, just maybe, if they&#8217;re two paragraphs and those two paragraphs summarize the article, they&#8217;re fine.  Meaning, none of my people complain about slashdot, since the article really is only if you want to know more, and the paragraph is enough for most of us.  But it&#8217;s not even worth my time to suggest something that&#8217;s not full-text to them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

