Friday thoughts
- I’m not Scoble, but my blog still loves me
- Blog on Friday looks tempting
- Recommended reading for the weekend: The Most Interesting New Tech Startup of 2009 by Anil Dash and The Policy-Speak Disaster for Health Care by George Lakoff
I blogged live some of the UGA Connect 2008 sessions via CoverItLive. Please scroll down for coverage of the sessions.
More coverage of the conference:
Session 1: Engagement

Session 2: PR on Facebook - The Public’s Perspective


Session 3 - Relationship Building

Session 4 - Keynote: Bert Dumars, Newell Rubbermaid

Session 5 - Social media and intellectual property, Doug Isenberg, The Gigalaw Firm
Follow Dr. Vorvoreanu’s live blogging of this session here: http://ci.cs.clemson.edu/mihaela/?p=108
Session 6 - Measurement: Jim Fetig & Kathi Wallace (GIT), Mia Lustria (FSU)


Faith and Confidence, by William C. Beall of Washington Daily News, 1958 Pulitzer Prize for Photography | More photos from Capture the Moment: The Pulitzer Prize Photographs exhibition
I’m thrilled to see that Dr. Karen Miller Russell has made available online one of my favorite articles, “U.S. Public Relations History: Knowledge and Limitations“!
With this, my modest role in the PR history is secured, and I can get back to work :)
Karen, please let me know if you have any project I can help with. All I’m asking :) is a follow-up to your article, “Public Relations in Film and Fiction: 1930 to 1995.” (Anyone who was shocked, shocked to see/read CBS’s Andrew Cohen’s take on the PR industry should read this article, available online -see the link below- via a USC Annenberg’s project, The Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture.)
If you are a PR student or practitioner, do yourself a favor: download both articles, and read them; they’re well worth your time.
Karen S. Miller (2000)
U.S. Public Relations History: Knowledge and Limitations (PDF)
In Michael E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, vol. 23 (pp. 381-420), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationThis analysis of the literature on public relations history indicates that the field has been dominated by a business history approach. Most scholars have studied public relations in its corporate context, and most have utilized business history’s dominant paradigm, which calls for a general theory of PR history based on the review of a large number of case histories. But the business history frame is both flawed and inadequate for a complete understanding of public relations history. Political and social histories show that public relations was emerging and apparently would have emerged even if big business had not. In reality, these histories are intertwined. No single strand of PR history can be understood except in relation to the others, and none should be given a privileged position in public relations historiography.
Karen S. Miller (1999)
Public relations in film and fiction, 1930 to 1995 (PDF)
Journal of Public Relations Research 11 (1), 3-28In this article, I examine depictions of PR and its practitioners in film and fiction in the United States from 1930 to 1995. The analysis indicates the representations of PR are woefully inadequate in terms of explaining who practitioners are and what they do, and it shows that writers dislike PR’s apparent effectiveness. Perhaps most significant is the extent to which the portrayals have remained the same over many decades. This study reveals misconceptions about and stereotypes of PR that are relayed to the public through the media, setting the stage for scholarship on what members of the general public think, for the enduring quality of representations suggests that the media may well have cultivated negative attitudes toward PR and its practitioners.
Here’s the latest update of the PR and Communications Blogs List. As always, corrections and recommendations are welcome.
[Updated 11.26.07 to add Voce Nation's change of URL]
General information:
New feeds:
Change of URL/feed:
Is The New PR nothing else than the old PR? No, I would argue (but I’ll postpone explaining why, since it’s past midnight already).
Think this way: if nothing else, self publishing and new technologies have created a rhetorical situation which compels us to speak — publicly — about PR as a profession and discipline.
This is our chance to make people understand that public relations is not about spamming journalists with pointless press releases, or about controlling the information, or…. [add your pet peeve here]. This is our opportunity to show that we have a role, one that goes beyond what has been traditionally assigned to us (from town crier or steward to traffic manager and conductor), and to (re)define it.
Let’s not waste this chance.
It’s official (almost): we’re starting to organize Global PR Blog Week 3.0.
It’s an event that will present the best articles, interviews, debates, case studies, and essays on how social media continues to change the Public Relations and Communications theory and practice, its relationships with other disciplines, and our roles as practitioners, students, and teachers.
It will run –like the other two previous editions– for one week.
It will happen online, at globalprblogweek.com.
It’s going to be a free event.
It will continue to be a community-supported, volunteers-driven, unaffiliated event. At least two prestigious research organizations will support the event, and any (non-financial) support that will raise the industry’s participation to it will be welcome.
It will encourage new voices and fresh perspectives, it will value experience and real-world case studies, and it will have (I hope) a robust international participation.
What’s new this year:
Also, we’re going to have:
Now, before discussing more about the nitty-gritty of the event, I’d like to ask you:
How do you see this event?
What do you expect from it?
What would you like to read/ see/ listen to?
What it will make it most valuable for you, and for the industry?
Please share –via comments, blog posts, or email– any ideas or suggestions on how to make this event a great one.
Thank you. We’re going to have a blast :)